I am not one who would point to official Cameroon Government sources as an accurate source of the POST-colonial history of Cameroon: Not at all. However, this narrative from the OFFICIAL website of the Prime Minister of Cameroon accurately describes the history of the peoples of Cameroon. It corroborates several other sources that I have been reading; and sources I have spoken to who know about the Equateur-Zaire connection. See what it says below about the Dualas.
http://www.spm.gov.cm/showdoc.php?rubr=6000&srubr=6104&lang=en&tpl=2
Meanwhile Dr. SAF challenged the contents of this citation saying:
There were no human beings during the prehistoric times. The PM's website is no source for academic reference. Just see the gaffe they have made.
Dr. Rexon Nting was also sceptical retorting stiffly that:
I think those sort of narratives endorsed by an untrustworthy regime cannot be relied upon.
Meanwhile Professor James Ashu, responding to Dr. SAF and Living Lights, thought otherwise by resorting to the origins of words; and writing:
Prehistory (Latin, præ = before Greek, ιστορία = history) is a term often used to describe the period before written history
The "pre-historic times" did not exist. That is based on Darwinian assumption that man began from animals which has been proven to be a fraud. So, who recorded the "pre-history" ? Man or beast? How can one talk of pre-history when they were not there?
Dr. SAF did not fully agree as well and challenged this definition with an extract:
"For example, in Egypt it is generally accepted that prehistory ended around 3200 BC, whereas in New Guinea the end of the prehistoric era is set much more recently, at around 1900 AD."
The statement above indicates that the term "prehistory" is culture bound. That is why I said the term is vague. Besides there have been no archaeological or anthropological studies done in the Central South Province of Cameroun to determine that the pygmies were the indigenous inhabitants of that part of Cameroun. Regardless of whether they were the first or not, they are Bantus. Bantu migration to the South and East from West Africa dates back to about 3000 BC. If Pygmies are Bantus, and we know they are because of the language they speak, then there were no people in the Central South of Cameroun before 3000 BC.
And then added with gusto:
After reading Mbua's statement, I must admit to you that I misread it. My earlier posting indicated that the term prehistoric is vague. For Egyptians, Prehistoric means 3,200 B.C. For your people in Manyu, prehistoric means something in the 20th century. That is why I said the term was not apt in the PM's website. Not only was it not apt, it is misleading.
You know the Homo sapiens (modern man, that is) were born around 190,000 years ago in East Africa. The pygmies are descendants of the modern humans. How could they have been living in South Central Province of Cameroon in Prehistoric times when we know they are Bantus? We know the Bantus were located in West Africa at about 3000 B.C. Some of the Homo Sapiens from E. Africa migrated north to Asia and Europe and the rest migrated to West Africa where they lived for a very long time. The Congo Bantus constitute one of several waves of the homo sapiens who left East Africa about 70,000 y. a. Recent studies have shown that they (Congolese Bantus) were in West Africa at about 3000 B.C.
Some time around 3000 B.C., there was a population explosion in West African, resulting in Bantu Migrations to the South and East of Africa. These migrations were not linear. Some bands of migrants made several U-turns back to their home of origin. That may explain why the Doualas who are a Bantu people think they came from the south. These are returnees. As I indicated earlier, not all Bantus migrated. Some stayed. Do you think all the Doualas left their home in the Congo? I am more than certain that some stayed behind. Those returnees came back to meet their cousins. Finally, no one knows for sure when the Bantu Pygmies left West Africa for the Congolese Forest and the South Central Province of Cameroun. It will be presumptuous of any one to think they were the first migrants because no studies have shown that they were the first bands of Bantus to leave West Africa for the Congolese forest.
Let me now ask two questions to tickle our minds:
(1) Was Bantu migration unidirectional?
(2) In the case of the Bakweries, Orokos, and Bakongo (Congolese), is it not possible that after 3000 BC, the Bakweris and Orokos migrated back from the Congo? (Around 450 BC)?
But according to Mola Richard Moki Monono: