A Bamenda Date with Destiny (Part 2): Calleth the Scared Lion Man, Cometh the Jilted Yes! Men

Louis Egbe Mbua

When a man begins to have illusions as being constituted of a lion incarnate, there are great chances that his animal instincts and spirit may begin to transform from that of humanity into that of a deluded and encapsulated lion skin. That man or woman -- whoever he is and wherever they abode -- starts having bouts of behavioural traits profoundly similar to a man living in the wild untamed savannah of Africa where animals consume other animals for food in the wildest anticipation and the most ferocious hunts.

The trouble with man is that he consumes similar animals; and goes further to consume his own type with unpredictably disastrous consequences. The reason for this strange phenomenon in human beings may be attributed to intuitive survival on the one hand, and corruption of the mind in the immediate instance. In a system where this philosophy of animalism is entrenched – and practised without Ndolo l’Amour, people begin to copy the original lion, joining him to the feast; on the exultingly flowery pretext of dancing for survival in the ballet of greed. But in the real sense, it is a matter of the corruption of the flesh: for only through the flesh can a man be destroyed.

The oppressor having sensed victory, avoids the main complaint -- out of fear -- co-opts another perceived strong man who will do his bidding; and the cycle of oppression continues unabated for yet a very long time until a bold David arrives to attack the bullying and deluded lion as to snatch the sheep from the jaws of the cunning and ruthless beast. This and only this alone, will end the feast of “The slaughter of the lamb” and "The Silence of the Lamb" terrifying movie show.

 Since President Paul Biya of the Republic of Cameroon took over from Ahdijo, the Bamenda region of Cameroon, and in fact a vast majority of Anglophone Cameroon has been deliberately underdeveloped despite its huge natural and human resource potential that may benefit the entire country. Roads in Bamenda and other parts of the territory have been neglected to rut. Promises, since 1984/1985 (25 years ago) of roads that would link the entire region have evaporated into thin air. The much heralded Bamenda airport has been converted into a military base. Paul Biya’s recently completed military visit has now fully confirmed the diabolical objectives of the Republic of Cameroon – namely to occupy Southern Cameroons by force – an illegal act with far reaching consequences in case the citizens decide to rise up to challenge this military jackboots who appear now to be in some kind of freebie to terrorise, brutalise and obstruct the peace of the region. It is now clear what the objectives of Paul Biya is: to cut off this region from its coastal counterpart by usurpation and deceit with some kind of economic bribe, and as such weaken the Anglophone ability to challenge his 30 year failed policy of misrule, mismanagement and gargantuan folly.

Paul Biya may believe that he will quell descent by terror, bribe and force. But he may be only sowing the seeds of instability, physical confrontation and his own downfall; for the place of nemesis is usually hidden; where one may believe there is a threat may not turn out to be the case.  There are reports that there was a facelift undertaken in Bamenda to prepare for his visit; and that this counts as development in some quarters. This is extremely foolish. Bamenda is just one out of dozens of heavily populated cities and towns in the region: there is Wum, Nyos (remember the forgetten 2000), Nso, Nkambe, Jakiri and other towns and villages who have not been touched by the least development for almost thirty years. More poignantly, thousands of indigenous natives and Cameroonian activists – and innocent people -- have been shot and killed in various parts of this region by the Republic of Cameroon forces. Others have died in prison and other terrible circumstances due to inhuman treatment and poor prison conditions – denied health care, food and exposed to brutal treatments such as beatings. To be shedding crocodile tears by the Biya men is not only dishonest but a complete waste of life-giving water. In this light, Paul Biya’s visit had been a poignant reminder of the terrible sufferings of the people rather than a triumphant entry into Jerusalem as some quarters have misguidedly portrayed. Has the blood of all those killed been sacrificed for cheap promises? Blood is unforgiving to those who betray the cause for power and bribes; for it is blood that gives life. Thus, a betrayed soul is tantamount to selling a people to a slave trader.

The Southern Cameroons (Anglophone) Elite Hypocrisy

The Southern Cameroons decolonisation case is unique. It is one of those rare cases where elites who mattered at the time of independence actually aided the capture of their own territory and subject their own people to servitude. This writer does not want to belabour the reader with historical material that substantiates this bold statement; for that is effectively confined to the past. However, to visualise the future and to prevent such wanton waste of a peoples’ future, this writer will revisit this argument of immense importance. While the visit of a de facto President is not a bad idea, it is madness to aid a President in his pretentious visit aimed at cementing the dismal future of an already subjugated people. While it may be right for a politician to support their party Chairman, in this case, Paul Biya of the Cameroon People’s Democratic Movement (CPDM), it becomes a sham if the elite of that party offers to contribute funds, and appear to deceive the common man to part with his meagre income to support the illegal visit of a frightened President who lacked the legitimacy to rule in that particular territory.

The elite of this region of Cameroon continue to trumpet their support for such a visit and as a result abet the colonisation of their own people. The reasons for their actions are clear – to be seen as “patriotic Cameroonians”. In this conjecture, there is a problem because it is not possible to be patriotic when one is first not accountable to his people; and that decades of neglect have left the people desolate, desperate and desponding. The supposed opposition party, the Social Democratic Front (SDF), with its political base in Bamenda, could not garner enough muscle to point to the problematic scores of the visit – that the President of The Republic of Cameroon – has the obligation to first sort out the Southern Cameroons vs La Republique du Cameroun problem as recommended by the international community.

The SDF Chairman of the Northwest Region, Mr Henri Kum, captured the myopia succinctly as reported by the Post newspaper before the doomed visit:

"Funeral celebrations have been cancelled, meetings postponed, weddings postponed, the population harassed and even all other traditional and cultural calendars severely altered. We think that the North westerners need an apology and reasons for the postponement of this visit." He said Cameroon being a country of law, it is but normal for the citizens to know what the managers of the nation are doing.”

"This quite arrogance on the part of the powers that be is not manifest only in this failed visit, but also on the issues concerning elections.”

Good observation. While the visit took place with much pomp and circumstance; and hailed as a “resounding success”, Mr. Henri Kum’s statement above captures how Cameroon is run; a system where leaders retrench into policies and decisions on the hoof; and with enormous cost to the unsuspecting population.

Meanwhile Chris Mbunwe of the Post Newspaper, Friday, December 03, 2010, wrote:

“The SDF party has said the people of the Northwest who have not relented an inch, making frantic efforts and enormous sacrifices to receive President Paul Biya in Bamenda deserve an apology from him for the failed visit that was initially announced by the Minister of to take place from November 29-30."

Well, Paul Biya never apologised; and will not apologise again if he fails to meet any future promises he ushered in Bamenda because nobody has actually questioned him to give an account of any of his obdurate failures. Nobody apologises to those who easily forget the wrongs they have been subjected to; and nobody takes seriously those who are easily swayed by sweet talk and artificial honey. Only natural honey tastes sweet to the tongue. What usher long life is natural; but that which comes in superficiality only hastens death. Like a bee that carries an invisible sting, so too is the man who promises honey but brings in weapons of destruction in the darker recesses of the night. He who does not see the ruse is already dead.

Again, what made him [Mr. Henry Kum] believed that he is respected; and does he actually believe that Paul Biya’s coming there was proper and legal with the present system of things in Cameroon? And why did he not understand the problems associated with such a military visit? From the pronouncement above, he appeared to have been lost as to why Paul Biya wanted to visit Bamenda and the North-West Region. If leaders do not have a vision and foresight, are not far-sighted, is it a surprise that the people have been led from one dungeon to yet another worse one? Does or did he wish for a military occupation of Bamenda? Mr. Kum and his SDF opposition should look far into the future before committing the people to terror, servitude and poverty by men who have little interests in the development of their territory but the usurpation of ancient powers and institutions.

As usual with the Anglophone elite, they at first maintained a strange silence. And then they went into a kind of mild attack as regards the lack of electoral commission in the so-called forth coming elections. That is not the point. While it is reasonable to challenge an incumbent, they got lost on the significance of the visit. As the Anglophone elite are more pre-occupied with their position in the now discredited Union of the two states, they prefer to fight for sour left-overs than to fight for their own self-determination. The results are that Anglophone politicians struggling to maintain a discredited the status quo prefers to please the majority Francophone elite than their own constituencies, to ignore the pleas of their long-suffering masses and join the gravy train to loot and terrorise. 

This has been the lot of the Southern Cameroons masses since 1961. Those who were put in position to represent the interests of their people turn around and fight against the interests of their own electoral college in favour of The Republic of Cameroon. Those who call for Life Presidency of a President who has largely ignored their concerns, spat at their faces time and time again, underdeveloped their territory for 30 – 50 years are mostly Anglophone elite in cahoots with the oppressor. They waver from one ridiculous political position to the other; they adamantly refuse to discuss the very serious Southern Cameroons problem but offer superficial solutions that have nothing to do with the original solutions by the UN in 1961 and which have been abused for almost fifty years – The Federation of two independent states. The psyche of Anglophone elite hypocrisy cannot be easily wished away or dismissed as that of a bunch of selfish individuals. This writer believes there are multi-faceted reasons for this alien and unreasonable approach to their own problems – cowardice and folly.

Devastation in Japan 1: Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Nuclear Explosions

Nuclear Explosion in Japan After  the Earthquake and Tsunami:  From mirror.co.uk

Louis Egbe Mbua*

In the realm of the functioning of the universe, man has no direct control. On natural disasters, when the universe choose to renew itself we have actually no say at all. On the other hand, man has the ability to create what is good for him – and what can actually destroy him. No scenario exposes the vulnerability and the sheer helplessness of man as to when the natural and the artificial embrace in a deadly love-hate match made from the depths of the earth. The earth is a mysterious planet. From above its firmament come light and energy – all of its light and energy from the sun. Again, there is no guarantee that this energy and light would always be beneficial. It can -- dependent upon other circumstances that one may not be able to fully explain and the sparsely known cosmological cycles -- turn against the earth and its components in inexplicably savage rage.

Solar flares can burn up and blanket- strip huge areas of and through the stratospheres to alter the earth’s magnetic field at the poles and disable the electrical systems of an entire nation that may have the misfortune to be on its flaring line of action. From the depths of the earth comes benevolence – food, vegetation and everything green, precious metals, heat, solid, liquid and gaseous fuels that power our civilisation, catapulting the entire humankind into untold wonders: including breaking through the space barrier and challenging the natural speed of sound and light with our technological explorations and aircraft escapades.

Strange! The same earth, at its inner core, is also a deadly enemy to human and its own existence. Seismic and geological shifts in its strata, pressurised magma at its core and violently active volcanic mountainous giants that dwell in the depths of the Oceans can blow their capped tops without warning. When nature decides to strike back, we start philosophising as to the exact reason for human life, why we live on earth and who is actually in control – man, nature or supernatural forces. In an attempt to harness and make sense of man’s elusively explained habitation on the planet, we have applied our creativity to construct, design and build what we have come to mimic the sun, the giver of life and energy.

Which brings us to the question: If the awesome power of the natural sun cannot be tamed by man, can man control a nuclear catastrophe that was brought into being by an earthquake that, in turn, triggered a Tsunami; that overwhelmed an Island and damaged the man made “sun”? Who is stronger – nature or man? And can man accelerate his own self-destruction -- foolishly? Can the earth destroy itself on all three counts of uncontrollable natural disasters in Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Nuclear explosions? Are we doomed since the days of Einstein and his General and Special Theory of Relativity? Or are we doomed by just nature itself?

Friday March 11 was a memorably apocalyptic and very sad day for the land of the Rising Sun! Poetic indeed! and the people of the Earth. About a month earlier, an Earthquake had struck in Christchurch, New Zealand, which lies in the “line of fire” – the earth quake zone in the Pacific realm – and which includes Japan. Although there were casualties and deaths, it was not very clear as to whether this natural disaster would spread to other areas perched perilously in the Pacific. The earthquake, one of the most powerful in Japan’s history, struck causing a ripple of water that waved to the height of a 4 story building, flattening whole towns that disappeared in an instant. Watching the shocking nightmare scenario may not show the exact reflection of the force involved until we understand the power carried by the sea wave that invaded North Eastern Japan with untold devastating effects with human suffering in tow. To get a closer picture of this epic deluge, the force required to exact the earthquake is equal to the force of water transferred to the sea by the earthquake and which subsequently was dissipated as it ploughs through the land consummating all on its deadly path.

Ancient Wisdom

The ancients were more versed with the raging oceans. When humans began building large cities, with hundreds of thousands of inhabitants, their acute wisdom and intuition directed them into the hinterland. From Thebes (Luxor) in ancient Egypt to Timbuktu in present day Mali, they established their cities and administrative capitals in the middle of their respective nations. Even Rome and Paris were and are not coastline cities. Although ancient Carthage was founded in the coastal regions of northern Africa, this could be attributed but to the barrier of the unforgiving and inhospitable Sahara desert.

When Alexander the Great from Macedonia founded Alexandra at about 300 BC in Egypt, he possibly never thought of earthquakes. However, recent anthropological research has revealed that the famous Lighthouse of Alexandra built by Cleopatra, one of the ancient wonders of the world was destroyed by an earthquake. Deep sea divers are today unearthing ancient monuments that were destroyed by this earthquake. While times have changed, and modern methods of building take into consideration the earthquake factor, it is only reasonable to believe that a coastal city is more prone to annihilation when the thunder of an earthquake is registered within destructive distances within the sea bed from populated coastal settlements and civilisation. Thus, ancient monuments and hence civilisation are more likely to survive and preserved, albeit possibly damaged in cases of natural disasters, when they are located miles from the coastline than within the confines of the sea boundaries.

This week’s devastating earthquake that almost brought down high-tech superpower Japan should now be brought into the debate. Japan, an Island, is more vulnerable to destruction by earthquake and a possible resultant Tsunami. The explosions at the Fukushima nuclear facility due to the earthquake and Tsunami could therefore not be prevented. Designs that include safety factors with an earthquake-proof concept in mind are ingenious but whether it is wise to locate a nuclear plant on the coast of an earthquake zone is another matter. However, an industrial nation needs power; and as Japan grew mightily in this respect, it logically follows that they will import nuclear technology.

Japan has an enviable record of technology transfer from already developed civilisations. Prior to World War 1, Japan sent out its students to Europe to learn, study meticulously, and import western technology to power her industrial and imperial ambitions. When the Chinese opposed Europe in their objective to colonise China in the nineteenth century, the Europeans, particularly the UK, devastated and bombarded China, seizing Hong Kong. This drama did not escape the keen eye of the Japanese. So, when the West arrived to Japan, the Japanese merely pretended to be in tandem with them. The unsuspecting Americans and Europeans were fooled! Thus they taught the Japanese the art of technology – building planes, ships, machine guns etc. Trade between the two counterparts boomed. It can, therefore, be inferred that Japan is no stranger to sophisticated technology; open to new and helpful ideas; and are not afraid to risk trying their able hands on new ones. This may provide a background as to why Japan became both an industrial superpower and a nuclear one to boot! 55 nuclear power stations all on its earthquake zone’s coast. To blame Japan for this location is to misunderstand how nuclear power technology works.

Technological Realities of a Nuclear Power Facility

Nuclear facilities are normally built near the coast or in riverine regions; reason being the availability of cooling water. There are possibilities of gas-cooled stations but this can be prohibitively expensive and technologically complicated. Abundant and accessible sea water is a more technologically and economically feasible natural facility. A nuclear reactor in action means that neutrons are used to bombard unstable radioactive elements such as uranium and plutonium pellets that take the form of fuel rods. This process results in the splitting of the atoms of these elements since they are unstable. Spitting requires that energy is released in the form of heat. At the same time, the striking of this atoms releases more neutrons which again strikes other atoms of the radioactive element to form a chain reaction and yet more heat and radiation. The temperature of the fuel rods can reach 1500 degree Celsius. Water contained in the nuclear reactor becomes superheated and turned into steam at very high pressure. The steam then powers a turbine that generates electricity. The water therefore is used to:

1 provide the power to make electricity

2. Cool down the fuel rods that carries the radioactive plutonium.

The second point on cooling is the most crucial. If the cooling system fails, as it did in the Japan case, then we may have what is called a nuclear melt-down. The fuel rods become overheated with the radioactive plutonium or uranium melting at the nuclear core through the protective re-enforced steel and concrete pressure vessel casing, thereby releasing dangerous radioactive material into the atmosphere that can kill or injure persons and animals instantaneously. Secondly, the pressure in the reactor becomes so large that the protective concrete wall gives way resulting into an explosion. Again, it is possible to release steam to reduce this enormous pressure. However, if the released steam has pressures that are greater than the safety limit on which the pressure vessel casings were designed, this, obviously, will also result to an explosion: again releasing radioactive material into the environment.

That has been the case with the Fukushima nuclear facility where three explosions have left the fuel rods exposed while the nuclear chain reaction might have continued with the possibility of a nuclear meltdown. Although there is shut down mechanism of the power plant to prevent nuclear reaction,, this cannot be guaranteed when the fuel rods are exposed and are not efficiently cooled with desalinated water. Moreover, the enormous temperatures may cause the water to disintegrate into its elements – Hydrogen and Oxygen making a fire more likely after the explosion or creating more pressures to trigger an explosion and fire. The danger is that the Pacific Ocean might have been contaminated by this unfortunate accident caused by the Earthquake and the Tsunami and the subsequent nuclear accident. The problem is that rivers obtain their water from rain fall which in turn is obtained from the evaporation of the oceans. Is there the possibility of a nuclear rain after these nuclear explosions and possible melt-down in a nightmare scenario? That is the question for the next series.

*This writer extends his sympathy to the people of Japan; and that the entire world should take steps to bring this unfortunate and devastating incident under effective control by contributing resources in man, material and moral support.



PRESS RELEASE CAMEROON: THE BAKWERI LANDS AND THE ABUSE OF A PEOPLE

Louis Egbe Mbua, Ph.D.

The BLCC (Bakweri Land Claims Committee) Easter Resolutions : passed by the BLCC (The Bakweri Land Claims Committee) Council in Victoria, (Limbe) Friday, 17th April 2009, following an Extraordinary Conference attended by all shades of the the Bakweri People in Cameroon and the Diaspora; meeting held at the BLCC Head quarters, Buea, Cameroon, Tuesday, 14th April 2009: Mola Njoh Litumbe, Secretary General of the BLCC  presiding; resolutions adopted in Victoria (Limbe), Cameroon at the Palace of HRM Chief Epupa Ekum of Dikolo, and revised in London, 30 January 2011.

The BLCC (The Bakweri Land Claims Committee) intends to bring a land expropriation dating back more than a century to an abrupt end. This conflict has its origins in 1891 when German imperialists attempted to seize native Bakweri lands. They were routed in a war by the Bakweri army in the same year. The contemporary Cameroon Government, based in Yaoundé, has been attempting the same shameful and underhand colonial tactics to appropriate Bakweri lands as the Germans -- as the French did after them – despite the entire of Cameroon being under a League of Nations Mandate and eventually under United Nations Trusteeship -- through oppression, intimidation, bribery, corruption and fraud. Nonetheless, the BLCC is determined to thwart protagonists of these oppressive legacies with the least possible delay -- this objective must be realised.

It is a basic wisdom; to allow people to decide what they wish to do with their property. However, if a man comes from a far away land, with no apparent notion of the rule of law; or the value of property especially its function in the perpetuation of posterity; and if that man persists in wilful marauding and rampage, greed, and thoughtlessness and arrogance despite having been instructed on the benefits of fair play in this regard, then the BLCC believes that he must be taught how to follow universal and civilised rules of engagement. If this man continues with crude approaches in this very important matter, there is little reason to entertain his folly rather than to teach him a lesson on the vicissitudes of confrontational conflict which he may be unable or unwilling to understand at this point in time. Equally, the BLCC bears no responsibility whatsoever for this ineptitude. Each party must face up to its own responsibilities without the interference of the other in this protracted conflict, until an amicable settlement is reached between the two parties. In this case, therefore, the BLCC believes in the dictum: “each man for himself” as regards the two opposing parties – the BLCC and the Republic of Cameroon.

Accordingly, the BLCC, with an exclusive global mandate to secure Bakweri lands; and in respect of the reclamation of Bakweri private native lands occupied by the CDC (Cameroon Development Corporation) have resolved as follows:

1. No plot, constituting native Bakweri lands, should be put up for sale or transferred without establishment of a legal document for land lease. A uniform template for this legal document will be drawn up. Any non-native who wishes to purchase or receive such land in Fako can apply for such a lease. Acceptance will be subject to intense scrutiny by the BLCC.

2. The Cameroon Development Corporation’s (CDC) lease for Native Bakweri lands has expired, and is therefore no longer valid because the sixty-year period stipulated by the original legal mandate (1st January 1947 – 31st December 2007) has run its full course. The Lease requires that Bakweri natives now take over the Company for the benefit of the indigenes. Any intervening purported extension of the aforementioned Lease on these lands without the knowledge and consent of the natives is, as a result, NULL and VOID in entirety: as, by extension, any prolongation of the said 60-year lease without the consent of the BLCC . As a direct consequence, any transfer of land to any third party as of this date is NULL and VOID; and the CDC (Cameroon Development Corporation) should desist from entering into any land transaction with any other party. Any breach of this legal restraint will be considered a hostile act against the Bakweris and the people of Cameroon; and the BLCC reserves the right to counter such purely naked disregard of native human rights, legal mandate and law with equal contempt. All non-natives who are purported to have bought lands during the original legal mandate of the CDC lease and after 31st December 2007 when the CDC legal mandate expired in these spheres of native influence have done so illegally; and all such transactions are thus rendered NULL and VOID.

3. Those who are currently occupying Bakweri native lands must start paying their rents or risk having their properties seized without warning because their occupation is tantamount to the surrendering of indigenous patrimony. This includes the CDC, The Cameroon Tea Estates at Tole, Del Monte Corporation at Tiko, The Cameroon Armed Forces who forcefully expropriated lands from Bakweri natives at Limbola , Victoria, to build their military barracks so that they may further oppress the natives and extend their land theft, and those who have bought the said native lands from traditional chiefs in Fako or from any other persons. The CDC Lands are private Bakweri property according to the Cameroon land ordinance law which came into force in 1974 in line with legal enactments during the UN Trusteeship of Southern Cameroons that declared the CDC lands to be NATIVE LANDS. These ordinances do not include any provision for sale or transfer of lands to non-natives. Thus, the recent peremptory surrender of CDC occupied lands is in total violation of the said laws; as well as being wholly inconsistent with the Banjul Judgement recommending arbitration.

4. The Ministerial order, Arrete 0000797/2.5/MINUHD200, 03 March 2003, by the then or now Cameroon Minister of Territorial Administration and Decentralisation, ADJI Abdoulaye Haman providing for non-natives, including the Anglican and Catholic Churches and foreign governments, to acquire free holds of native lands in Fako is Illegal and a monumental fraud because it contravenes the 1974 land ordinances. The BLCC, therefore, considers this a distraction and a non-issue to our main objectives of securing the Bakweri lands. The BLCC therefore, utterly REJECTS this order. The BLCC are under no obligation whatsoever to comply with fraudulent laws designed to alienate the indigenes from their own land. Consequently, the BLCC has the right to occupy any lands, without due warning, that were acquired under this illegal, undemocratic, authoritarian, fraudulent and expansionist order from misguided and malicious sources.

5. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR), sitting in Niamey, Niger, in 2003,  passed a Resolution imposing an injunction on the President of the Republic of Cameroon, Mr. Paul Biya, restraining his powers to further alienate the Bakweri natives from their own land. In pursuance of this restraining order, the same ACHPR, with the endorsement of the African Heads of States sitting in Banjul in 2004, ruled that the entire Bakweri Land should be under international sanction and auspices until a settlement is amicably reached between the Cameroon government and the BLCC under the auspices of the African Union Rapporteur. As a result, any land deals entered into by the Cameroon government and any third party after these periods (2003/2004) violate these injunctions and sanction. It follows that any individual who breaks -- knowingly --these rulings may be classified as an international CRIMINAL. The BLCC have the exclusive legal mandate to begin international criminal proceedings against these authorities.

6. The BLCC is fully aware and informed of the massive and blatant land racket that has been established by the Biya regime; and perpetrated and enforced by enemies of the Bakweri and the Cameroon people in a pre-meditated and malicious scheme calculated to dispossess the natives of their own territorial heritage so as to be replace them with non-indigenes from far away ethnic groups. This, too, the BLCC considers as being CRIMINAL in that it represents a gross contravention of international human rights as stipulated by the United Nations Charter on Human Rights.

7. The BLCC reserves the right to institute CRIMINAL proceedings against agents of land fraud and human oppression in this context. The BLCC is also aware of the unbridled and seemingly unrepentant corruption of government officials who have been drawn, willingly, into the dragnet of land crimes; abusing the power vested on them by the Cameroon people, so as to expropriate lands from the oppressed natives in clear violation of the aforementioned injunctions and sanctions.

8. The BLCC is in the process of seeking legal proceedings to halt the wanton, CRIMINAL and illegal distribution of lands by the Cameroon government and its ceding of lands to Bakweri Traditional Chiefs without due consultation with the natives (BLCC). The BLCC will be seeking financial damages and back rents owed to the natives by the Cameroon Development Corporation from 1st January 1947 to date, 31 January 2011; and for the shameful land theft by the Cameroon government which has a notorious record of grotesque fraud, incompetence and unbridled bribery; and which shamelessly advances blatant lies to the international community in connection to the Bakweri lands. The BLCC is shocked to note that Mbonge, in the Meme division; and Tombel in the Kupe-Mwanenguba division, both in Cameroon, which are entirely hemmed by plantations -- cultivated by the Cameroon Development Corporation and the Pamol Corporation – despite having the same Lease as the Bakweri lands have been left intact while the Cameroon government has been distributing native Bakweri lands. Having considered this matter carefully, the BLCC has arrived at the definitive conclusion that this represents a concerted conspiracy and crime solely designed to drive the indigenous Bakweri from their own home so that people of alien origin will possess the land.

9. The BLCC is conscious of the fundamental natural law: that man is made from the earth as decreed by God in Heaven, Creator of all things on earth and in Heaven; and that we eat, live, are born and die on earth; and that the BLCC commits all its work to God, The God of Justice, Companionship, Compassion, and Peace and the Giver of land and life. This Land was given to the Bakweri people by God; and not by the Cameroon Government or by any other agency -- human, celestial or spiritual. The BLCC is, therefore, committed to pray to God and fast so that the BLCC organisation should not be infiltrated by corrupt humans and celestial spirits bent on destroying the good work of God and the BLCC. While we may be a minority ethnic group in Cameroon, Africa and the World but we have the Lord before us to fight against agents of destruction, injustice and oppression.

10. The BLCC is, therefore, serving a WARNING to the Biya regime:

(i) To abide to the CDC Land Lease, the UN Trusteeship agreement, the League of Nations Mandate of the British Cameroons under United Kingdom Administration on native land laws as applied to the CDC Lands, The United Republic of Cameroon ordinance law of 1974, the Niamey injunction 2003, and the 2004 Banjul ruling on sanctions on Bakweri land; and

(ii) To engage in an amicable arbitration of the Bakweri land dispute in the presence of the AU Special Rapporter with the BLCC as ruled by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights;

OR

(iii) Face an international opprobrium as a pariah state and other criminal charges.


(iv) THE CAMEROON GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN WARNED.

Louis Egbe Mbua, Ph.D., President BLCC Europe.

CC: The Chairman of the African Union

The President of the United States of America, Barack Obama

The President of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights

The United Nations Organisation Secretary General

The President of the Republic of Cameroon

Dr. Vincent Cable, MP for Twickenham, Greater London, England, UK

The President of the Fako Chiefs Conference

Fako Traditional Chiefs

Amnesty International

President of Fako UK

President of Fako America

The Chairman of the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC), Bota, Victoria (Limbe), Cameroon

The General Manager, Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC), Bota, Victoria (Limbe), Cameroon

Living in the 21st Century (12): El Paradiso

Louis Egbe Mbua



Fir trees from the water sprayed ground grow

To unimagined heights their kept tops float

Above the earth onto the shimmering skies

For before then no clouds an eye had seen.



Life-giving fruits from the fertile ground sprung;

Delightful and pleasing to human buds

And painting the earth like coloured sprays

That no human ever could ever have foreseen.



This was but the one part existing,

The other side of the new garden was

Not in the Eden East but hidden west

And on the shimmering West River side.



An afterthought so conceived like teens

That the East Garden in the cosmos it hangs

Strapped onto the unknown with a chasm

So far as no man a remote stretch attempts.



But insists with little foresight the other one;

Conjuring illusions from sources unknown

That the Hanging Gardens were paradise

To be kept, pruned and worked on site.



Hours passed, toil and sweat they exude,

Floods of tears were the fruitless outcome

Cries and groans were heard across the north:

“Where is the fruit, where are the flowers?”



They heard a chorus from the proverbial pruned

Garden trees, voices well watered and trimmed:

“We are in the real celestial El Paradiso !“

“But you are in the Fool’s Paradise!”

A Bamenda Date with Destiny (Part1): The Day Cometh, The Man Runneth

Bamenda, Cameroon

Louis Egbe Mbua

Not since the spectacular no-show of one of my friend’s first date with a London sophisticate has one witnessed another incident of such magnanimous ignominy. The much-hyped visit to Bamenda by President Paul Biya of The Republic of Cameroon was turned into the main event of the year, transformed into a speculative event of the month and finally to a spectacular non-event of the day. That it has descended into a colourless fiasco is an understatement. The unexpected confusion began when the government of Cameroon decided to celebrate the 50^th anniversary of Cameroon’s independence this year, 2010. While there is nothing wrong in celebrating the year of a nations’ independence, it becomes a conundrum that needs to be addressed with tact and wisdom if that particular nation is comprised of two independent nation states complete with two different independence dates. Let the reader understand: for contemporary Cameroon is an amalgamation of two UN Trust Territories – The French Cameroun, now called the Republic of Cameroon; and which was under French Trusteeship and the Southern Cameroons under the UK Trusteeship, now under colonisation by The Republic of Cameroon. The latter attained an UN-sponsored independence on 1 October 1961 while the former – The Republic of Cameroon -- attained her independence under the same UN body on 1 January 1960. The two states merged to form The Federal Republic of Cameroon on 1 October 1961 with separate governments and internationally recognised boundaries.

So, when officials of The Republic of Cameroon with Capital in Yaoundé, made a unilateral decision to celebrate the 50^th anniversary of the entire Cameroon this year, and without consultations with Southern Cameroons officials based in Buea, Bamenda and in the Diaspora, the stage was set for the unfolding political drama that has culminated into a dragging official disaster. To citizens of The Republic of Cameroon, there is nothing wrong with this disreputable arrangement, while Southern Cameroons citizens considered such a decision not only arrogant and historically dishonest, but a profound case of provocation; and an attempt by The Republic of Cameroon to cement her annexation ruse of their territory in violation of both national and international laws of states. Southern Cameroonian Nationalists and other concerned citizens of that state rejected outright, such a ubiquitous move, and what they believe to be that of a desperate Cameroon trying to hang on to illegality with their finger tips.

The Southern Cameroons National Council (SCNC), the liberation movement seeking to restore the independence of Southern Cameroons from the “vice-grip” of The Republic of Cameroons annexation, and The Southern Cameroons People’s Organisation (SCAPO) who has vowed to drive out La Repubique du Cameroun from the Southern Cameroons soil immediately reported the matter to the international community and the United Nations. As a result, President Paul Biya became extremely frightened of the implications and the consequences that may follow the prestige of Cameroon in relation to the international community. In a last gasp for political breath, Paul Biya then modified the “50^th anniversary of Cameroon’s Independence” to include another “50^th independence anniversary in 2011” to accommodate Southern Cameroons own independence date. While this may appear as an astute compromise to wiggle away from accusations of annexation, it appears this only helped in throwing a large dose of petrol or gas into an already explosive political conflagration since this only buttressed the legal arguments of the Southern Cameroonians as regards their stolen independence.

The United Nations on their part have maintained a diplomatic silence on this confused state of affairs. However, reliable reports state that the United Nations representative was invited to Yaoundé. His gift to the President of The Republic of Cameroon, it is alleged, was two flags – one for the Republic of Cameroon and the other for the Trust Territory of Southern Cameroons. If these allegations are true, it would mean that Paul Biya has no legal mandate to rule the Southern Cameroons, and that the Southern Cameroons nationalists have been symbolically vindicated in all intents and purposes in totality. Consequently, Paul Biya’s projected visit to Bamenda is a non-event since he will be visiting but a foreign state, meaning he must obtain a visa from the UN and Southern Cameroons. If he violates this rule, any Southern Cameroonian in Bamenda has the right to make a citizen’s arrest of Paul Biya for trespassing a foreign soil without due permission. Now, theoretically, this is the case but whether this is enforceable is another matter altogether. However, whatever light we look at the grim political confusion, this omen is bad for this visit. This may possibly explain why the man runs away from his own created troubles.

It is interesting to note here that the aim of the visit, in real sense, is not to celebrate the 50^th anniversary of Cameroon’s independence. Paul Biya went further by stating clearly that his visit to Bamenda was to celebrate the 50^th anniversary of the Cameroon army. In any political and military adventurism, there exist great risks – to the civilian population and the army itself. The mere mention of the military; and that they are to parade within the confines of a disputed territory is tantamount to performing military games in that territory and consequently evokes war or intent to occupation. This is because there is no evidence to show that those deployed military men will leave the territory after the “celebrations”. The world cannot be fooled in this instance because recent events on the planet bear witness to disguised military manoeuvres, regime change and other pretexts to celebrations or good “wars” have resulted to occupation of a weakened and desperate people by foreign powers that have a sinister and wholly disreputable agenda to loot by terror, barbarism and mediaeval subjugation.

When the United States went to Iraq, the excuse was to dislodge Sadam Hussein who purportedly harboured Weapons of Mass Destruction – a shameless lie. Now, whether Sadam was an evil tyrant or not is not the point in this expose, but that his overthrow did not lead to an immediate evacuation of the US military but that they stayed over to occupy Iraq with disastrous consequences for America, the civilian population in Iraq and the world. If we apply a similar scenario to the envisaged occupation of Bamenda, it is of little telling what the results and outcome will look like. In addition, the Southern Cameroons is not yet 50 years old nor have they ever had an army. The logical conclusion is that Paul Biya, in his attempt at subjugation, has inadvertently shot himself with his own gun.

To add to Paul Biya’s visible frights, is the spectre of The Africa Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) ruling and recommendations (Communication 266/2003) on The Republic of Cameroon Vs the People of Southern Cameroons in July 2009. According to these recommendations which are freely available on the African Commission’s website, the two parties would, by this time of last year, have engaged in constitutive talks to resolve the constitutional matters in relation to the projected Cameroon that came into existence in 1961. While the Southern Cameroons side have clearly, and officially, indicated their willingness to be part of these talks and fruitful dialogue under the auspices of the African Commission, and hopefully, the United Kingdom, and the United Nations, the government of the Republic of Cameroon appears to have asked for more time to prepare for the talks. But as to the time of this writing this essay, it is unclear as to their commitment to the resolution of the crisis. The Cameroon Communication Chief, Tchiroma Bakary, has gone to the media proclaiming, arrogantly and intransigently, that The Republic of Cameroon will not dialogue with Southern Cameroonians because “they want to divide Cameroon”. Whether Mr. Bakary is serious in his pronouncements and exhortations or not is unclear. Yet, his bellicose utterances only go a long stretch to cast doubts on the sincerity and integrity of the Biya regime, and as a consequence throw a large dose of mistrust between the two parties.

The Southern Cameroons issue is not whether people wish to live separately or in a Union: because the two states were originally separate; and that The Republic of Cameroon has been found wanting by violating the common norms of the envisaged Union; and using subterfuge and brute force, political fiat and blatant discrimination to stampede on the rights of the people of Southern Cameroons. It is, by nature, normal for those whose rights have been violated and their territory colonised to stand up to say No! To be surprised by such actions is itself surprising because the inalienable rights of man can never change. The following is that unless the Republic of Cameroon engages in sincere dialogue with Southern Cameroons, President Paul Biya’s visit to Bamenda would and should be considered an act of aggression; and that Paul Biya and the Cameroon army would be fully responsible for any opprobrium that may emerge if he defies the international community and Southern Cameroons people to visit Bamenda without consent as prescribed by international law. The right thing to have done or to do by any reasonable and wise leader would have been to announce before the entire Cameroon people, his intentions to abide by international laws, notably the Banjul verdict of the ACHPR, and the United Nations plebiscite arrangement in 1961 that brought forth contemporary Cameroon.  Save this, his military visit to Bamenda is doomed to confusion – whether it happens now or later.





Living in the 21st Century (11): Valley High

Louis Egbe Mbua

As many a man climbs to the mountain top,

But few with grit and whit unabashed;

To some but destiny a stranglehold is placed

On them, locked and tightened non-stop:

All plausible options are only whole despair:

On to the seas do they wallow down,

To be swallowed up by the leviathans pretend;

Drowned by tears of sorrow, a thought

To climb onto the peak of the mountain top!



The path and ways to the precipice Mountain High

Are tortuous, rugged, stones, time-bitten.

By the hands of the age, life’s fountain

In deep springs from the mountain slope arising;

That waters the same life-giving plants:

Animal attractions in the new forest waltz gate,

Put on splash for creation’s view exquisite

Show for all creatures as the cycle around flies

With supplies forever last in Mountain High.


Awake! On the premier crow in Valley Low

From a sound of the first cock blasting

Through the chilling foggy air wispy blowing

Past the gentle swaying velvet leaves

As the man in swag and the chime in starts:

Briskly through the narrow rocky path

Winding, a twist, to veer, ploughing to transform

Grassy plains savannah and forest lush

To barren rocks, feeding gulls of Valley Low!


Ladies were out on this male Odyssey’s End!

Trudging in a crowd of the siblings’ Beaux

Climbing, scaling in flavour’s respite bloom

In numbers, counting only in twin,

In pairs they join, moving in their chosen roils.

Snacks they would receive at high vaults

Hanging in the sky roofed with clouds reeling,

Waiting for those with means to spend,

On to the mountain top to meet Odyssey’s End.

The Raging GCE Exam Debate (Part3): Denouement and Practicalities of the System

Cameroon Finance Minister, Essimi-Menye:boasted oil producing Ndian division of Cameroon does not need roads. Bad roads have affected educational performance, totally impoverished Ndian and almost irreversibly set back other social advancement in the oil and fish-rich division.

Louis Egbe Mbua

The recent outstanding performance of students in the Cameroon GCE as analysed in the Fako UK website is commendable. Standards have definitely improved. However, the writer firmly believes, amongst other factors, that one of the important aspects of education is that a student receives the qualification; and that the total number who pass should be reasonably large, thus reflecting the total population of a particular region where those institutions are located. On this line of thought therefore, one is surprised to note that the Manyu division of Cameroon, and one of the regions that is famed for producing some of the brightest minds in that country could only present 703 students to sit the A Levels in 2010 of which only 486 of them passed as portrayed in Table 4 in Fako UK News Centre . From population estimates of the NW and SW Regions of Cameroon (Southern Cameroons) obtained from Scribbles From the Den, one had the impression – possibly a disputable assumption -- that the Manyu division may be one of the most populated in the Anglophone region of Cameroon and so rendering the small number of A Level entry very disturbing. One is of the opinion that this social retrogression—if one were to consider the academic and personal achievement records of indigenes of this area --has a strong correlation with the area’s 50 year neglect by the present Cameroon government and the system of things.

A Potential New Bakassi Crisis – Deja Vue

The region is totally cut off from Cameroon since there are no communicable roads to the division for the almost 50 years of independence; and that the lone airstrip that used to be the main civilian hub into the enclave has been converted into an army base for oppressive political reasons. Hon Ayah Abine, an MP from Manyu in the Akwaya sub-division, an area that directly shares Cameroon’s western borders with Nigeria, recently sent an open letter to the present Prime Minister of The Republic of Cameroon, bitterly complaining about blatant discrimination and the starving of well deserved funds to improve schools and roads in his constituency. This is a criminal act by the government of The Republic of Cameroon. The people of the Akwaya region should challenge this shameless tyranny by questioning the continued paying of their taxes to Yaoundé; and to resist the rapacious instincts of a colonising huntress and her scrambling agents.

It is now common knowledge that the contemporary Cameroon government neglect schools in this area. Pupils attend schools without any discernible infrastructure in place; with the regime believing, misguidedly, that this responsibility would be shouldered by the indigenes themselves. Teachers shun the area due to its inaccessibility -- non-existent roads and poor working conditions; and that to reach Akwaya, one must first go through Nigeria, make an incomprehensibly circuitous U-Turn through thick, dark and dangerous equatorial forest through Nigeria and then into Cameroon. This is extremely disgraceful. Most poignant is that the elite of the Manyu division are busy fighting for positions in the present regime in Yaoundé while neglecting their own people. Those who are high up in the system continue to deceive the people while the decay takes hold. One would not be surprised, therefore, that a vast majority of children in the Akwaya region attend schools but in Nigeria. This may partially explain the small number of entrants in the GCE Exams in the Manyu division of Cameroon. And unless concrete steps are taken to revitalise these roads, we may face another Bakassi-styled problem in that part of Cameroon.

 The Ndian Social Predicament and Exclusion

A detailed observation of the results also brought the regions of Ndian and the Kupe-Muanenguba – where only 177 and 423 students respectively sat the A Levels -- into close examination. Again, a similar social and infrastructural problem exists in these areas. Ndian division is where the disputed Bakassi is located, and where a majority of petroleum is extracted by the Cameroon government. Yet no decent roads exist in this region. A recent nakedly insulting, inflammatory and provocative proclamation -- an open secret opinion of the regime—was uttered by design or gaffe by the Cameroon Minister of Finance, Mr Essimi-Menye, boasting on Cameroon National Television that Ndian division of Cameroon does not deserve roads, and that whether it is oil producing or not is a matter of profound irrelevance in this case. Discrimination and folly by the present system in Cameroon have deprived and continues to deprive young people from fulfilling their full potential. Professional teachers shun these areas since amenities for education and other facilities for general entertainment are virtually non-existent. Health care is almost certainly zero. Children suffer from diseases such as blindness and other infant ailments that had been eradicated in the last century in other parts of the world – majority of countries no longer suffer child blindness. Unsurprisingly, the elite of these regions are busy with empty individual political pursuits, boot-licking their political masters in Yaoundé so that they may fight over sour crumbs that fall from the table of greed-- refusing to stand up for their people; and to empower the children of the next generation with decent education. It is an anomaly to note that a region with so much to offer a nation would be going cap in hand to the world to appeal for charity so as to obviate an evidently precipitous and calamitous decline of their people. For it is not possible to attain a good education without proper roads, health care, teachers and social amenities as these drawbacks kill intellectual incentive and the motivation to move forward and reach higher heights as one may won; with a potentially lethal psychological defeatism creeping in when they compare their dire circumstances and unbearable conditions with their counterparts in other parts of the country with far less economic leverage.

The Educational Winners Against all Odds

The Bui, Ngoketunjia, and Boyo Division of the North West Region, and Lebialem of South West Region of English-Speaking Cameroon should be highly commended. Their excellent performance is a clear indicator that depravation alone cannot stop humans from striving to higher stations; and stay there and that one must wrestle with problem and achieve even in a state of institutionalised Apartheid and exclusion by a system so designed. Since the Southern Cameroons independence, on 1st October 1961 and the forming of the now destroyed Federation with the Republic of Cameroon, these regions have almost been cut off from Cameroon complete with impassable roads and other social exclusion – No manufacturing industry exists in the North West region of Cameroon despite its huge human and natural resources potential. However, it would seem that the presence of strong catholic missionary activities in health and education has more than offset the debilitating assault by the Yaoundé regime to starve them of developmental funds; a typical case being the Lake Nyos Disaster Aid fund that allegedly melted into thin air without the slightest trace. In addition, parents in these regions who are mostly small-holder farmers, invest heavily on their children’s education as a priority. Their kinsmen in the Diaspora, have been displaying, flexing considerable charitable, financial and material muscle to stem the and plug the holes in neglect of educational and health resources and facilities by the government. Congratulations, also, to Mezam of the NW region for putting up such a stunning performance.

An Eldorado in Stagnation and at Risk of Steep Decline with Mixed Results

The writer now makes a call on the GCE results of the Fako division of Anglophone Cameroon; and one of the most strategic hot points of Cameroon, abundant natural and human resources and where the Chariot of the Gods marry the Atlantic Ocean; and the seat of at least two Anglophone Universities. Although the performance at the A Levels is respectable, it does not reflect the social and infrastructural resources– even if minimal -- put at their disposal. Consequently, one can only attribute this below the par performance to poverty of the native population in particular and the entire inhabitants in general. While other areas of this discussion have their ancestral land to till and obtain income, vast tracts of the most fertile parts of this region are occupied by the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC), a key company in Cameroon. Thus, the native population, who are traditional farmers from the beginning, have no viable places to till the soil as they have been pushed to the edges of these plantations and the slopes of the rocky mountain – a difficult area to farm with its stony soil and mountain farms. The government again does similar games playing: building schools without full infrastructure; and depending on the elite to do the rest. Well, this does not always work out if the population is impoverished due to occupation of their land. It is now left to those in the Diaspora to step up their humanitarian contribution  so as to obviate this potential downward slide or intellectual stagflation. On the other hand, the elite in the Diaspora should take up the responsibility, and start real hard and serious charitable contribution to this area – organising more worthy material and financial packages to,  at least hold back the academic decline.

The Cameroon Development Corporation( CDC) controlled by the Cameroon government has refused to pay land rents or any form of royalties to the indigenes while instigating a corrupt scheme to distribute land to be bought by government officials in a bare-faced violation of all known traditional, national and international laws; thus compounding the poverty in the area further. If the Cameroon Development Corporation (CDC) were subsidising local schools and population – providing scholarships to the deprived and underprivileged children with talent, this would be a positive point. But all they do is exploitation of the land without putting anything back to benefit the actual owners of the land -- the natives -- and resident inhabitants. In the days gone by, the 1960s, this corporation used to run schools, provide free medical care and other social facilities to the general public. This has all but disappeared .Consequently, one expects an examination performance that falls short of the full potential of the region; and unless these ills are addressed we will continue to see a fall in educational success rates in this region of Cameroon.

The Return and Successes of Francophone Cameroon

It is interesting to note that French-speaking Cameroonians are now sitting the Cameroon GCE Exams and performing excellently. Although one does not have actual figures to fully substantiate this assertion, it is true to note that the situation was not exactly the same twenty years ago. This should be commended; and was the original plan of the Cameroon Union. It is unfortunate that short-sighted French-speaking politicians attempted to destroy this qualification and thereby potentially depriving the future generation of young people to benefit from a decent education. If any politician attempts to destroy the GCE, I believe young people and their parents should resist them. Rather, they should lobby for government subsidies to schools that perform well on these qualifications and other internationally accepted certificates. They should also argue for more English-speaking schools and Universities to be established if this is what a sizeable portion of the population of the nation clamour for. This action, if put in place would deflate the pressure on scarce places in these institutions – mostly located in Southern Cameroons. In terms of education, it is only a blind nation that begins to inject poisonous politics into the system with the pretext of improving and empowering his people. The more choices young people –and even adults – have at their disposal, the more chances for self-improvement and hence advancement of that nation. Conversely, an inward-looking nation where people believe in prejudices and discriminatory policies in terms of learning only concretises the foundation for poverty and social retrogression in both the near and farthest futures. It is no use training top level lawyers, doctors, priests, engineers while there are no elite technicians, fashion designers, social workers, musicians and nurses; and that those who fall by the way side are left there for eternity. There has to be a mechanism within the system that lifts them up from the unproductive abyss to national pride and contribution as the reverse psychological effect is to spur their determination to succeed, to marshal their pride to participation in social, political and economic development.

To conclude, it is important to differentiate between Examination led success and an all-round educational triumph. The latter attainment manifests and is reflected in real life and after the process – a constant – while the former is observed and confined to a small location at the same time it occurs – an instance. While the stars of the GCE should be congratulated, it should be noted and we have to be reminded here that Exam results do not fully reflect educational attainment. Whether one is able to maintain that level after school is the true test of a sound education. Overall, this writer believes that there have been reasonable strides in the advancement of education in Cameroon and the UK. There is considerable room for advanced research in this area of education in Cameroon if we challenge the problem in an open debate and take resulting solutions on board.

Congratulations to parents, staff, students, administrators and leaders of the education sector in Cameroon and the UK; as well as all who have encouraged and inspired the writing of this three-part article.

Thanks to FECA-UK for allowing me access the Cameroon GCE data and statistics of June 2008-2010; and theirown monumental  and pioneering work on this important subject